Displaying All Comments

You should let it all the way it is.
RW Photos is a “Easy to Use” prog., in my opinion.
if someone need that. he sould use the windows option that,
summarise all open windows of one prog. that would propably the same as documents.

I would prefer the tabbed interface. As now all current browsers use tabbed interface this would be easy to use by all forms of users (inexperienced, average, experienced). Also there are other apps that do this. Such as Mac OS X.5’s Terminal application. This can really help designers if alll RW apps were tabbed featured. Maybe even include compability for Mac OS X because now it shares 10% of the market and would be easier for users to just have it native instead of having to go to bootcamp. Michael

I like the use of a tabbed inteface however these can get crowded so maybe the user could optionally limit the amount of tabs opened per session.

I’ve come very much used to how the majority of programs nowadays utilize the tabbed interface. I like it, and find it relatively easy, neat and tidy to navigate around. The problem with opening a new program window (the current setup) is that it uses more memory, I find. So a program is more likely to crash, my computer is more likely to slow down, etc… A tabbed interface uses only 1 window, just opens multiple documents within. Thus, I think the tabbed interface is an advantage both for possible “taxing” of a computer’s memory, as well as for how programs have come to be in more recent times.

I think there should be an option to set it to any of them, I’d probably personally use the tabbed inteface, but I think it would be nice to be able to set it to any of the three. Maybe even a google chrome-esqe drag-and-drop tab function for the tabbed feature, so you could have multiple tabs in multiple windows. I just got the software, and I love it so far, thanks for creating this =Þ

Yeah, a tabbed UI but with a drag and drop for other windows would be ok

A tabbed UI would be much easier to use for those who like to multi task a lot on their computers, as it reduces taskbar space dramatically.

TABED WOULD BE SO MUCH EASIER

Ya it would be way better and easier to use.

The tabbed interface would be more efficent. You could see what files you have open more readly and still be able to use the whole screen. With the window within a window method you cant see what files your working with without shrinking the current window. With the multiple programs type the files grouped in tab is ok but I agree with the above comment about using to much of the systems resources. Tabs are great when combining and editing different files at the same time. Its like flipping between pages in a book

The tabbed interface would be better.

I prefer tabs but would it be possible to allow for dragging a window to a tab and vise-versa. I don’t mean only one or the other but a mix both. In other words have a window with tabs and a window or windows without tabs existing at the same time. A windows could be dragged in converted to a tab and a tab could be dragged out converted to a window at will.

I would like a tabbed interface.

The program is great and powerful. However, I would suggest using tabs for future versions. However, I would like to limit the number of tabs in one window.

Tabs. Definitely.

I shall give my opinion in percentages.
Tabbed: %50
Windows In Main Frame: %45
Window By Window: %5

Thanks to all for your opinions. It seems that tabs would be a good thing and I will add them to the long term plan. They may not make it into the next version, but who knows…