Displaying All Comments

Log-in or register.

Go back to article.

Erik (2011-04-09 20:59:03 / 5 stars):

Awesome, 22 awesome icons!

5/5

Daniel W. (2011-04-10 00:55:56 / 5 stars):

LOLs I love how it has two five-star ratings and five "likes" but no downloads. I'll be the first. ;-)

Great job!

Unknown author (2011-04-10 01:53:02):

Really good - 9/10. Just the bear reminds me of a turtle or a strange fat frog, sometimes :p.
Oh I'm second ;-)

Sirea (2011-04-10 11:26:09):

Daniel W. Icons look good (maybe), but it is special theme. Not everyone needs them.

Daniel W. (2011-04-11 00:21:22):

Oh yeah, totally agree. Just funny. :-)

Unknown author (2011-04-23 04:02:37):

Why would you release an icon set that is clearly commercial in nature under a non-commercial license? It's obvious to anyone with experience that you can't sell icon sets to most people. Why not release them under a attribution license to attract more business from buyers? No downloads probably reflects this. I'd use them on a network of 600 websites and give attribution, but instead, I just find someone else's public domain or attribution sets. And authors... don't forget icons can be used as favicons too, not just on the desktop.

Sirea (2011-04-23 10:10:46):

Anonymous.. you are right. I change the licence.

jojois74 (2011-09-13 02:44:38 / 5 stars):

These are nice. I just don't like the books though. They look too round.

77cool99 (2012-07-15 21:03:28):

These are great icons! You worked hard on them.

deadly bro (2013-04-13 14:06:30 / 4.5 stars):

these are very cool but the books's end doesn't look like a rectangle but more like a circle instead the rest are great my most liked and beloved on is the console

Unknown author (2015-05-21 07:56:43):

Awesome very cool icon if all set I will use for www.mysmartreviews.com

Unknown author (2020-07-12 03:06:31):

Really good icons tho |-)

Why would you release an icon set that is clearly commercial in nature under a non-commercial license? It's obvious to anyone with experience that you can't sell icon sets to most people. Why not release them under a attribution license to attract more business from buyers? No downloads probably reflects this. I'd use them on a network of 600 websites and give attribution, but instead, I just find someone else's public domain or attribution sets. And authors... don't forget icons can be used as favicons too, not just on the desktop.

Why would you release an icon set that is clearly commercial in nature under a non-commercial license? It's obvious to anyone with experience that you can't sell icon sets to most people. Why not release them under a attribution license to attract more business from buyers? No downloads probably reflects this. I'd use them on a network of 600 websites and give attribution, but instead, I just find someone else's public domain or attribution sets. And authors... don't forget icons can be used as favicons too, not just on the desktop.

Go back to article.