data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a5d4a/a5d4a7d5099488fe614fef0b251e5724819e3098" alt="user icon"
Really good - 9/10. Just the bear reminds me of a turtle or a strange fat frog, sometimes :p.
Oh I'm second
Categories of wares, that you can find in online shop.
Really good - 9/10. Just the bear reminds me of a turtle or a strange fat frog, sometimes :p.
Oh I'm second
Daniel W. Icons look good (maybe), but it is special theme. Not everyone needs them.
5 out of 5 stars.
Oh yeah, totally agree. Just funny.
Why would you release an icon set that is clearly commercial in nature under a non-commercial license? It's obvious to anyone with experience that you can't sell icon sets to most people. Why not release them under a attribution license to attract more business from buyers? No downloads probably reflects this. I'd use them on a network of 600 websites and give attribution, but instead, I just find someone else's public domain or attribution sets. And authors... don't forget icons can be used as favicons too, not just on the desktop.
Anonymous.. you are right. I change the licence.
5 out of 5 stars.
These are nice. I just don't like the books though. They look too round.
These are great icons! You worked hard on them.
4.5 out of 5 stars.
these are very cool but the books's end doesn't look like a rectangle but more like a circle instead the rest are great my most liked and beloved on is the console
Awesome very cool icon if all set I will use for www.mysmartreviews.com
Really good icons tho
Why would you release an icon set that is clearly commercial in nature under a non-commercial license? It's obvious to anyone with experience that you can't sell icon sets to most people. Why not release them under a attribution license to attract more business from buyers? No downloads probably reflects this. I'd use them on a network of 600 websites and give attribution, but instead, I just find someone else's public domain or attribution sets. And authors... don't forget icons can be used as favicons too, not just on the desktop.
Why would you release an icon set that is clearly commercial in nature under a non-commercial license? It's obvious to anyone with experience that you can't sell icon sets to most people. Why not release them under a attribution license to attract more business from buyers? No downloads probably reflects this. I'd use them on a network of 600 websites and give attribution, but instead, I just find someone else's public domain or attribution sets. And authors... don't forget icons can be used as favicons too, not just on the desktop.
Find out how Vista icons differ from XP icons.
See how RealWorld Icon Editor handles Vista icons.